Skip to main content

Astronomers Discover New Planet That Really Makes Earth Look Like S***t

It's a big news, set to shock, amaze, and entertain the world. But unfortunately, it's got nothing to do with a second Earth or better that Earth planet. However, since you're now reading, you'll almost certainly be interested in this research that looked into the clicking and sharing behaviors of social media users reading content (or not) and then sharing it on social media.  Last April, NPR shared an article on their Facebook page which asked "Why doesn't America read anymore?" The joke, of course, is that there was no article. They waited to see if their followers would weigh in with an opinion without clicking the link, and they weren't disappointed.




We've been hoping for a chance to try it ourselves, and this seemed like the perfect opportunity.

A group of computer scientists at Columbia University and the French National Institute looked into a dataset of over 2.8 million online news articles that were shared via Twitter. The study found that up to 59 percent of links shared on Twitter have never actually been clicked by that person’s followers, suggesting that social media users are more into sharing content than actually clicking on and reading it.



“People are more willing to share an article than read it,” the study’s co-author Arnaud Legout said in a statement, Washington Post reports. “This is typical of modern information consumption. People form an opinion based on a summary, or a summary of summaries, without making the effort to go deeper.”

This study looks into the psychology behind what makes people want to share content. Research conducted by The New York Times Customer Insight Group looked into what motivates people to share information. Just under half of the people asked in the survey said they share information on social media to inform people and to “enrich” those around them. Conversely, they found 68 percent share to reinforce and project a certain image of them – in a sense, to “define” them.

In the words of one participant from the study: “I try to share only information that will reinforce the image I’d like to present: thoughtful, reasoned, kind, interested and passionate about certain things.”

It also raises the question of whether online media is just a massive “echo chamber”, where we all just like pages and viewpoints that reinforce our own beliefs and are not interested in information for the sake of information. Even the algorithms of social media sites mean that individuals or pages that you tend to click on, like, or share – which are most often the articles or viewpoints that you agree with – will more frequently turn up on your News Feed.

As a user of online media, you’re probably quite aware of this.

So, if you are one of the lucky few who managed to click and read this article, we congratulate you! Although we do apologize for the misleading headline. In the meanwhile, have fun sharing the article and seeing who manages to chair a discussion on Earth 2.0, without ever reading it.


Comments

Post a Comment

MUST READS

4th Dimension Discovery Shocks Scientists Around The World

Impossible Physics: Meet NASA’s Design For Warp Drive Ship

BYE, BLACK HOLES: WHITE HOLES ARE EVEN WEIRDER And Spewing Matter From Another Universe

10 Strange Physics Facts About Antimatter That Everyone Should Know About

The Kardashev Scale – Type I, II, III, IV & V Civilization