Skip to main content

Impossible Physics: Meet NASA’s Design For Warp Drive Ship

Warp drive can travel 10 times faster than the speed of light without actually breaking the barrier of light. However, most experts consider that the technology will never truly work. Regardless of this, NASA has already released designs for a faster-than-light spaceship that uses the imaginary tech. Absolutely Amazing DESIGN! 

Before we get into this, you should know that many scientists are now researching the possibility of warp drive (and EM drive and many other modes of faster than light travel); however, most scientists think that such methods of space travel basically aren't viable, cheers to the fundamental physics of our universe.

Even though part of this article is purely, “Oh my gosh, look at this incredible design,” that’s not the whole point. To that end, let me break this all down a bit so we have an thoughtful understanding of what exactly is being suggested in relation to warp drive, and why it is seen with such doubt, before we get too carried away…

Alcubierre Warp Drive via Anderson Institute

In 1994, physicist Miguel Alcubierre proposed a completely new kind of technology that would let us to travel 10 times faster than the speed of light without actually breaking the barrier of light. That seems a little differing, doesn’t it? After all, we have been told again and again that light is the general speed limit – nothing in the universe can travel faster than light (much less 10 times faster).

And here lies the important Alcubierre drive: When you use it, you aren’t really moving through space.

This technology would not actually push the ship to speeds beyond light; instead, it uses the distortion of space-time allowed by General Relativity to warp the universearound the ship. Fundamentally, when the drive is started the space-time behind increases, but in the front it contracts. In this respect, the path in use becomes a time-like free-fall.

Alcubierre’s concepts have led to a number of fascinating thought experimentation's in quantum field theory; but, as mentioned above, many scientists think that the warp drive technology will never actually work. When you contemplate about it that kind of makes sense. Clearly, warping space involves a lot of mass and energy, and confirming that the space where you are situated isn’t warped is complicated business. Indeed, the proposal was mostly just a assumed experiment when it was first planned – not something Alcubierre believed was actually feasible technology.

As physicist Sean Carroll records:
In brief, it involves negative energy densities, which can’t be firmly disproven but are possibly unrealistic; the total amount of energy is possible to be equal to the mass-energy of an astrophysical object; and the gravitational fields created would possibly rip any ship to pieces. My individual estimate of the probability we will ever be able to construct a “warp drive” is much less than 1 percent. And the odds it will be constructed in the next 100 years I would put at less than 0.01%.[Reference: Jalopnik]
That said, scientists will probably be making papers speaking about these ideas for some time. We will continue to cover them as they appear and however things can look painfully dismal for this technology, who knows what the future may embrace.

But on to the design…

Image via Mark Rademaker

In 2010, NASA physicist Harold White exposed that he and a team were operational on a design for this faster-than-light spaceship, and this is the most new design of what such a ship might truly look like. As you can see in the photo, the ship rests between two huge rings, which make the warp bubble.

Artist Mark Rademaker drived the project with Harold White. In the release, Rademaker declares that he spent over sixteen hundred hours working on the design. The ship is called the ‘IXS Enterprise’, and it is destined to fit the idea for a Faster-Than-Light-ship. Mike Okuda also brought participation, and made the Ship’s insignia.

To give you some idea of just how breathtaking warp technology would be: A journey to the nearest star (Proxima Centauri) which rests some four light-years from Earth) would normally take over 17,000 years. But, with the Alcubierre drive, it would take less than five months. For those of us who have a perceptual breakdown on 10 hour plane air travel, 5 months might still look like quite a bit of travel time. But when speaking of about the gigantic cosmic distances between planet Earth and Proxima Centauri, a 5 month space-trip would be a great success of massive proportions (don’t forget, it took Curiosity 8 months only to reach Mars).

See more pictures of the design below.

4K Wire frame IXS E

Images via Mark Rademaker.


  1. So what were the results on this in Housten

    1. Michael Lewendon
      30 July at 00:11
      sent an email to Seth Shostak SETI-NASA man as follows: Dear Seth, How would you explain to someone that possibly the future came back, and the evidence will be on archives of that morning, what type of evidence would record such a Huge UFO, where and on what instruments? On 11th September 2004 early morning between 6-8 my wife and I watched a UFO huge, typical shape, pastel coloured lights round middle, looked like it was spinning due to the small thunderous clouds that were racing through it? 8 minutes later we followed it up the road where it veered off east towards London. No need to report UFO as it passed along main Motorway ,hundreds must have seen it ,and besides it was 100 yards away from an Nuclear Research Station, hundreds of cameras, guards, radar, spectrometers, guider counters, gravitational meters, all sorts, many more, no need to report it? When I realised nobody had seen it only my wife and I it dawned on me we must have got caught up in its time tunnel-warp bubble, hence why no cars passing us, no birds, no sounds, tried to tell the authorities in my country (England) hoping they would investigate, but no cant even get a reply? Guess they think they would have been able to detect something of that size, being there for eight minutes or so? Haven't got a clue why us?, Don't know why it came here? but it did and it would have left a trail somewhere? SETI and its people would know best where to look? what instrument's would have distorted by the UFO? Sent letters and emails to everyone who might be able to call for an investigation, as this belongs to our future, the future of mankind, The day they come to me and my wife for tests on us, and question us for answers will be the day I know they found the UFO we saw. Hope you can bring this all to a head one day? Or at least ask why this so important sighting with all the archive evidence, that will prove all we saw, has never been investigated? Can answer any questions at any time via email. yours Michael lewendon END OF EMAIL Now you would not expect a man who has searched his whole life for E/T and proof of it to pass me on to MUFON who only data bases most UFO sightings, MUFON definitely have not got the power to investigate this sighting, and he knows that, he also knows that NASA has a big interest in the this Nuclear Establishment Has he been told to direct me towards a UFO data base site? that cant investigate an M.O.D Establishment? Cover up? don't know? what do you think?

  2. This well work. If the rings spin fast enough to create a small gravitational pull it won't take much. Then like a fish that pulls out oxygen from the water to breathe, to collect the negative energy densities. You won't need alot. Then to slow down you turn of the rings and collection.


Post a Comment


NASA Admits Alcubierre Drive Initiative: Faster Than The Speed Of Light

4th Dimension Discovery Shocks Scientists Around The World

The Kardashev Scale – Type I, II, III, IV & V Civilization